|
Gender Inequality in Reproductive Decision Making
By Rubina Karim Samnani
The status of women in Pakistan is not homogenous. The women’s
situation in comparison with men is one of systemic subordinate.
Home is defined as a woman’s legitimate ideological and physical
space, while man dominates the world outside the home. He is bread
earner and decision maker of the family. This Gender inequality is
also chronic in reproductive decision-making. According to Bankole
and Singh (1998) “Men and women in this countries desire fairly
large families; however, husbands tend to want more children than
their wives and to want the next child sooner” (p. 15). Initially I
was biased that women’s are responsible for following their
husbands and partners but after reading and searching articles I
realized that sometimes they themselves are not aware about their
reproductive rights. Ali and Khan in (2007) also believes that
“Even though they are aware about those rights, still they are
unable to come forward to prevent themselves as either they are too
young, weak, ill or they believe the hot-tempered behaviors of men
as normal” (p.27). Therefore in this article we will discuss about
the gender inequality in reproductive decision making from the
point of view of social context, its consequences and strategies to
prevent this inequality.
Gender inequality in reproductive decision making is very important
from the point of view of the social context of our country as
Speizer, Whittle & Carter, in their article Gender Relations and
Reproductive Decision Making in Honduras (2005, p.131) also cited
that Gender inequality in reproductive decision-making is a key
element of the social context of reproductive health (Bankole &
Singh, 1998; Becker, 1999; Speizer, 1999). When this discordance
occurs in a situation of male authority, men's opinions about these
issues may overrule women's. In some cases, husbands fear that if
they approve of family planning and allow their wife to use it,
they will lose their role as head of the family, their wife may be
unfaithful or they may lose face in their community. (Bawah et al,
i999; Watkins, Rutenberg &Wilkinson, 1997) Even when men approve of
family planning in theory, they may disapprove of their partners'
practicing contraception (Blanc, 2001).As a result; women may
sacrifice their own wishes to those of their partners (Bankole &
Singh, 1998; Becker, 1999; Speizer, 1999). Alternatively, women may
practice contraception covertly, potentially exposing themselves to
financial vulnerability or emotional or physical violence if
discovered (Population Council and Interagency Gender Working Group
(IGWG), 2001).
Numerous other perspectives are also linked with gender inequality
in reproductive decision making. Because if this matter is not
addressed here its consequences will be fatal, from socio economic
point of view the economic burden will increase day by day as the
numbers of children will increase and this can lead to poverty. In
turn poverty will effect on the care of the children, their
education and quality of life and ultimately in child labor. From
ethical point of view the female autonomy is disturbed through the
violation of reproductive rights as her husband is overruling her
decisions. Another ethical problem occurring here is this that the
female can therefore go against her husband’s decision and can
practice family planning secretly by violating another ethical
principal of deception and veracity. From reproductive health point
of view the women are getting towards the risk of maternal
mortality and morbidity because of low nutrition state, poverty and
multiple pregnancies. Largely it is very much vital to understand
the consequences of inequality in reproductive decision making from
different point of view in order to get to the bottom of this
problem.
It seems important that how one should act in situations like
gender inequality in reproductive decision making. I believe that
communication and education are two best strategies to prevent this
situation. Communication plays the most important part when you
deal with such a sensitive case. First of all one should built
rapport and try to explore different factors that may affect equity
in reproductive decision making are women who lived in less urban
areas, had less than a secondary education or low socioeconomic
status had elevated odds believing that men alone should make
reproductive decisions and of living in a household in which the
man made those decisions (Speizeret al, 2005).Then by keeping these
factors in mind empower the woman and give her awareness about
their reproductive rights and about the advantages and
disadvantages of different contraceptives. Lastly arrange some
session for men because for women to talk to her husband in country
like Pakistan will be unhelpful. Thus Programs need to target men
directly with strategies that encourage them to communicate with
their wives about reproductive decisions. according to (Speizer et
al, 2005).These strategies could include using community outreach
workers in factories or other locations where men congregate in
rural areas; mass media campaigns that show group of men discussing
the usefulness of having discussed reproductive decisions with
their wives; and working in schools to encourage more balanced
relationship dynamics between males and females from an early age
or refer men to family planning counseling services in order to
persuade them in to take joint decision for reproductive health.
Thus for upcoming situations my recommendation are to involve men
and woman both while addressing these issues and by keeping in view
the cultural and religious perspective offer education to both the
partners about the use of family planning methods. Aware them about
the different resources of availing these facilities like family
planning clinics. And finally we can also teach them about the
fatal consequences of their actions. And hope for the positive
response in their attitude.
This was all about the social context of gender inequality in
reproductive decision making, its consequences and strategies to
prevent it. Woman can, of course, control her fertility without her
husband's cooperation; yet when men and women are aware of and
responsive to each other's health needs, they are more likely to
obtain necessary services. Moreover, strengthening communication
between partners about reproductive health and involving men in
health promotion can lead to better health for the entire family (Nustas,
1999, p. 181).
|
|
.
|
|
|
chitraltimes@gmail.com
|