|
Wolves & Human Conflicts
As human populations expand and natural habitats shrink, local
people and animals a re
increasingly coming into conflict over living space and food.
People living near forest lose their crops, livestock, property,
and sometimes their lives. The animals, many of which are already
threatened or endangered, are often killed in retaliation or to
'prevent' future conflicts.
Human-wildlife conflict is one of the main threats to the continued
survival of many species, in many parts of the world, and is also a
significant threat to many local human populations. Surplus killing
is defined as the killing of several prey animals too numerous to
eat at one sitting. During a surplus-kill, a predator's killing
instinct is continually sparked off by the stimuli of so many prey
animals unable to escape, so that the predator cannot stop killing.
An instance of surplus killing by wolves was witnessed in many part
of the world every year. The wolves had eaten only a few parts from
half the calves and not touched the rest. Wolves sometimes only eat
a part of their surplus-killed prey, like the tail or the internal
organs.
However, conditions in nature which favour surplus killing are
unusual. Consequently surplus killing in the wild is rare, though
fairly common in domestic situations in which the prey animals are
usually confined and unable to escape the attackers.
wolves cooperatively hunt any large herbivores in their range.
hunting revolves around the chase, as wolves are able to run for
long periods before relenting. It takes careful cooperation for a
pack to take down large prey, and the rate of success for such
chase is very low. Wolves, in the interest of saving energy, will
only chase one potential prey for the first thousand or so meters
before giving up and trying at a different time against a different
prey]. Therefore, like most other pack species, wolves must hunt
continually to sustain themselves. Solitary wolves depend more on
smaller animals, which they capture by pouncing and pinning with
their front paws. This technique is also common among other canids
such as foxes.
The wolves, not willing to risk injury, are more likely to yield
when encountered with such a bold individual. Instead, they will
try to target weaker prey members that are easier and safer to
hunt. Wolves are generally inefficient at killing large healthy
prey, with success rates as low as 20% which is due, in part, to
the large size and defensive capabilities of their prey.
Like many other keystone predators, wolves are sensitive to
fluctuations in the abundance of prey. They are likely to have
minor changes in their populations as the abundance of their
primary prey species gradually rises and drops over long periods of
time. This balance between wolves and their prey prevents the mass
starvation of both predator and prey.
Although wolves very rarely attack humans, the causes of wolf
attacks may vary greatly. Habitat loss for example can cause the
wolf's natural prey to diminish and therefore cause the local
wolves to turn to attacking livestock or on some rare occasions,
even people. Close proximity to humans may also cause habituation.
In this case, wolves lose their fear of humans and consequently
approach too close. Habituation usually happens when people
encourage wolves to come up to them, usually by offering them food,
or when people do not sufficiently intimidate wolves. Habituation
can also occur accidentally. With unrestricted hunting, forest
clearing and intensive livestock grazing there is little natural
prey, therefore forcing the wolves to feed on domestic animals and
garbage, then bringing them in close proximity to humans. However,
wild wolves are often timid around humans, and usually try to avoid
contact with them, to the point of even abandoning their kills when
an approaching human is detected. Wolves are a part of our
ecosystem, and :-
Wolves, like all other wildlife, have a right to exist in a wild
state in viable populations. This right is in no way related to
their known value to mankind. Instead, it derives from the right of
all living creatures to co-exist with man as a part of natural
ecosystems.
This harsh judgment on the wolf has been based, first, on fear of
the wolf as a predator of man and second, on hatred because of its
predation on domestic and semi domestic animals and on large wild
animals. It is now evident that the wolf can no longer be
considered a serious threat to man. It is true, however, that the
wolf has been, and in some cases still is, a predator of some
importance on domestic and semi domestic animals and wildlife.
Conflict with man sometimes occurs from undue economic competition
or from imbalanced predator-prey ratios adversely affecting prey
species and/or the wolf itself. In such cases, temporary reduction
of wolf populations may become necessary especially when it can
contribute to maintaining positive or neutral attitudes toward
wolves, but reduction measures should be imposed under strict
scientific management.
Scientific knowledge of the role of the wolf in ecosystems has
increased greatly, although it is inadequate in many countries
where the wolf still exists. Management should be established only
on a firm scientific basis, having regard for international,
national and regional situations. However, existing knowledge is at
least adequate to develop preliminary programs to conserve and
manage the wolf throughout its range.
Ajaz Ahmed
Chitral
|
|
.
|
|
|
news@chitraltimes.com
|