|
IMPORTANCE OF RESTRAINTS IN PERSPECTIVE OF PATIENT AUTONOMY
BY:
ANILA MUHAMMAD
“Why Mr. X lying on floor without cloths and even uncovered private
part? Why his body was restraint with chain treated by policeman?
How cruel the staffs were? It’s really against human rights. It’s
just because of his sin? I had asked myself isn’t it malpractice? I
think they don’t have humanity”. These questions are always bother
me and made me depressed. Physical restraints are always considered
as an issue and nurses many times have concept about the use of
restraints. This paper is all about a situation which I have
observed during my clinical visit to one of the government
psychiatric hospital. During round of the hospital I have observed
that Mr. X was tightly tied up with chain on both hands and legs.
He seems as he was mumbling for some help and I was shocked to see
him in such condition. I had never seen this type of restraint
patients in my previous bedside nursing, although, I had taken care
of very agitated patients in neurology clinics. It made me and my
colleagues depressed and even my faculty also felt the same. Then I
had inquired by one of the doctor who was with us that, why the
patient was lying on floor with out his cloths, I was informed that
he was in this situation because of his sins and whenever, he
shouts he has been treated very badly by several policemen and
gives him injection to calm down. Other than that doctor informed
that the prisoners feed him daily and he passes urine and stool in
that top sheet. There was no care for these types of patients and
all personnel were treating him like he is not a human being.
Environment of that area in the hospital was like that that
patients were treated as animals in the cage. No doubt it is nurses
and doctors, whose obligation is to protect their patients from
injury but restraints are not only the solution as in the above
mention scenario, which tells us that the legal issues of our
society and the poor illiterate patients who doesn’t know about
patient cares and even do not aware of their rights. This incident
was so disgusting that whenever I see any patient in restraining
this incident triggered in my mind to think about it that why that
patient was treated like this. This made me think that whether
patients at agitated and aggressive state should restraint or not
what could be other alternatives, what are the impacts of
restraints on mental health. Therefore, this whole paper is
revolving around with this issue in the reference of Pakistan and
planning, implementation and evaluation of certain strategies to
overcome this issue.
If we see the Pakistani context this issue is very significant
because people have understanding that those patients should
restraints that are mad and mentally ill. They could not accept
that this is also one of the interventions to deal with aggressive
and violent patients who try to harm themselves and others. That
might be one of the reasons that the doctors of that hospital did
not know about restraint. However, many health care personnel
misuse the restraints like the same as that government hospital,
where patients were really restraint like animals in suicide ward.
. Nobody was realizing the impact of restraint on mental health of
a patient in that particular situation. However they follow the
criminal law for criminals in the jail but why they follow the same
law in the mental health institute. Either they could not
understand the what is mental health mean or they just follow
whatever they taught previously from their followers. According to
Iqbal, Naqvi, & Siddiqi (2006) “In Pakistan, where there is little
regulation of psychiatric practice the potential of abuse of
disturbed psychiatric patients by inappropriate, excessive and
unnecessary use of both physical and chemical restrain is
huge”(p.04).This is We can judge, what would be conditions of other
hospitals in Pakistan because patients don’t argue with the
treatment. They think restraint as part of the treatment and they
don’t raise voices for their rights. As in the west people sue
against nurses and hospitals for misusing restraints. According to
Rogers & Bocchino (1999), “Researchers have shown that restrained
patients are hospitalized twice as long as those who are not; that
restrained patients are eight times more likely to die during
hospitalization than are non restrained patients” (p.27). Although
their no significant Pakistani data is available but we can make
assumption on the basis of this data. Because what I have seen
patients with physical restraint in government hospital it would be
more than that. That is why this issue is very significant to be
raised. Iqbal, Naqvi, & Siddiqi (2006) “Although various studies
have been conducted on in patient violence, they lack
methodological vigor and findings are contradictory. No study has
been carried out in Pakistan” (P.01). In addition to it According
to Iqbal, Naqvi, & Siddiqi (2006) “Unfortunately, the recently
introduced Mental Health Ordinance, 2000 does not address the issue
of physical and chemical restraint adequately” (P.04).
For analyzing we need to know what physical restraint is. Physical
restraint defined by Stilwell, (1991) “Physical restraints are any
devices, materials or equipment that are attached or adjacent to a
person preventing free bodily movement.” Cited Yam, & Cheung
(2005). (p.34) However, Lee, Gray, Gournay, Wright, Parr, & Sayer
(2003) states, “Control and restraint are a set of formally taught
techniques used to hold patients in an attempt to control and
restraint potential or actual aggressive and for violent behavior
in ward situation” (p.425). Perhaps it is questionable that whether
restraint’s uses are for the benefit for the patients, the health
care personnel or for policeman. Whenever I relate this question
with my scenario, I could not get the answer. Mr. X was restraint
because as he was agitate or violent behavior or because of its
sin. According to Yam, & Cheung (2005) “physical restraint tended
to be used more often in the most serious situations, i.e. when the
patient was dangerously violent and there was fear of injury”
(p.35). Still I think that why I didn’t used any other alternatives
to control Mr. X, might be that time I was so confused and not
familiar with the environment. It’s seems me that all patients are
in the jail not in the mental health hospital. I have informed by a
doctor who was with us during round that they are not following any
guideline of restrain because they have to follow criminal law. For
that they just treated the patient as criminal not as patient. Even
they couldn’t realize the impact of restraint on Mr.X mental
health.”
According to WHO (2001) “Many psychiatric hospitals retained the
jail- like structure of their construction in colonial times.
Patients were referred to as inmate and were for most of the day in
the care of warders.”
Furthermore, in spite of practice myths among nurses that the use
of physical restraint can protect patients from any harm or injury,
a range of serious adverse effects and consequences are also
associated with their use. There are negative psychosocial effects
such as low social functioning, and adverse emotional reactions,
associated with the use of restraints. The author has identified
three categories injuries of the patient with restraint. The first
category of physical injury is associated with the direct impact of
the restraint device on the patient. According to (Evans et al.,
2002). “These injuries include lacerations, bruises, nerve damage,
ischemic injury, asphyxiation and even sudden death from
strangulation.” Cited Yam, & Cheung (2005) (p.35). The second
category is related to the injuries as a consequence of the
enforced immobilization. According to Yam, & Cheung (2005) “These
include reduced functional ability, loss of muscle tone and
contractures.” (p.35).As said by author restraint patients also
suffer from psychological harms associated with According to Yam, &
Cheung (2005). “restraint reactions like anger, fear, humiliation,
depression, agitation and regressive behaviors.” (p.35) Furthermore
the author has been clearly reported that “the morbidity and
mortality rates are eight times greater among restrained patients.”
(p.35).When I reflect back to my scenario patient became affected
the uses of physical restraints because he was badly restraint with
chain and without cloths. He can have physically, psychologically,
and emotionally injury because no nurse would take care of him. On
the other hand I have also felt depressed. I didn’t able to
concentrate on the round throughout of the hospital. No matter the
patients restraint to control their aggressive behavior but I have
remain fearful if patients harm themselves. No matter I was not
direct care giver of that patient but I can understand the
potential harm like accidentally he went into the respiratory
distress. However nurses become more vigilant while taking care of
violent and aggressive patients having restraints, ultimately nurse
stress increases at work place. However, nurses should be aware of
the adverse consequence of restraint on their patient, especially
the psychosocial effects. According to Yam, & Cheung (2005) “For
potentially violent patients, nurses experience a sense of fear,
helplessness and hopelessness.” (p.36).
In addition, there are several strategies to deal with issue of
physical restraint. Ethical consideration with the use of
restraints conflict between patient’s safety and patient should be
regarded as having worth, dignity and autonomy even on the event of
possible physical risk. First of all, nurses should analysis the
situation in reference of risk benefit of restraint’s use should
always be a last resort. After careful consideration, nurse need to
take precautionary measures which include: correction of underlying
problems. Sometimes hypoxia, infection, medication toxicity,
electrolyte imbalance, depression and pain can all contribute to
confusion, agitation and aggression. Second is individualize
approach, nurses should try to determine whether it is discomfort
that is agitating the patient. Offering to help maintain simple but
meaningful rituals may diminish agitation and eliminate the need to
sedate or restraint. When patients are in agitation state,
literature also supports that, reorient the patient frequently.
Keep the patient warm, dry and comfortable. According to Rogers &
Bocchino, (1999) “Establish eye contact; maintain a conversation
even if the patient is confused. Listen and validate patient’s
concern. Explain procedures before touching the patient. Human
beings provide an important part of the sensory environment for
most patients”. Chemical restraint it another strategy to save
patients from physical restraint. In above mentioned scenario
patient got chemical restraint beside physical restraint but not in
a way that patient know about it that restraint is a part of
treatment might he understand it’s a part of treatment to kept him
chain and lying on floor. More over, some alternative steps to
relax the patients can be utilized to prevent patients from
aggression like massage, music therapy. By applying above mentioned
alternatives can be relevant to deal with the issue of restraint to
prevent mental health deterioration based on individual, group and
institutional.
If I relate the scenario then following would be the planning
process and implementation. The purpose of restraint is to
facilitate optimal care of the patient. Use of restraint must not
to be an alternative to control human behavior. Restraint should
only be used when alternative therapeutic measures have proved
ineffective to obtain the desires outcome. On behalf patient rights
with full disclosure of the likely risks and benefits ratio so as
to kin or proxy third party to make decisions obtain their informed
consent before the use of restraints. According to Iqbal, Naqvi, &
Siddiqi (2006) states,“At AKUH, policy and procedure documentation
serves as a guideline in staff training and patient management.”
All healthcare providers should understand the standards by which
they will be judged and fulfilling their obligations for their
patients. Media can also play an important role if channalize the
information in right direction.
If nurses uses all above strategies, it can enhance mental health
of patients ultimately nurses can also promote their mental health.
As work load would be increase at work place so if nurses follow
the proper use of restraint they control over that situation. After
through assessment many patients might not require physical
restraint and can be saved from further mental health
deterioration. According to Iqbal, Naqvi, & Siddiqi (2006) “In
physical restraint can not be initiated with comprehensive
multidisciplinary risk assessment and patient-care’s involvement.”
Ultimately by applying above strategies it will enhance mental
health of people of Pakistan.
To summarize, physical restraint might cause many negative impact
on patient Therefore, health care institutions should provide
proper protocols to nurses. They should know how to manage agitated
and aggressive patients and applying other alternatives to control
patients in confusion state. Physical restraints should be used as
a last resort. Institutional policies are most important factors
contributing to prevent the misuse of restraint.
To conclude, education for the staff regarding chemical, physical
and psychological restraint must encompass training and competency
programs in all health care institution especially in hospitals.
According to Yam, & Cheung (2005) “The awareness of patient’s
rights and self determination has filtered through all medical,
nursing and allied health education programs.” (p.38). Conduct
ongoing education sessions for staff so they can aware of the
policy and aware undesirable effect. Other than that no matter
physical policy is their but the staff attitudes and some important
factors contributing to its misuse.
|
|
.
|
|
|
chitraltimes@gmail.com
|